- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
          tests: Use cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128 in conv-bits-runtime-const
          #143475
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    `conv-bits-runtime-const` gates `f16` and `f128` tests behind `x86_64`,
but this isn't always accurate. In particular, x86 `MinGW` has an ABI
bug [1] which means things work when linked to our Rust math libraries
but don't work with host libraries. RUST-143405 slightly adjusts which
targets we provide `f16` and `f128` symbols for and effectively removes
MinGW from that list, meaning host libraries start getting linked,
meaning `f16` and `f128` tests start to fail.
Account for this by changing the gates in one such test to
`cfg(target_has_reliable_{f16,f128})` which is the way we should be
gating all behavior related to the types going forward.
`rustfmt` also seems to have formatted the macros which is fine.
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115054
    | rustbot has assigned @compiler-errors. Use  | 
cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128 in conv-bits-runtime-const
      
              
                    jieyouxu
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Jul 9, 2025 
                  
              
              
            
            
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
| r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 9, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #142357 (Simplify LLVM bitcode linker in bootstrap and add tests for it) - #143177 (Remove false label when `self` resolve failure does not relate to macro) - #143339 (Respect endianness correctly in CheckEnums test suite) - #143426 (clippy fix: indentation) - #143475 (tests: Use `cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128` in `conv-bits-runtime-const`) - #143499 (Don't call `predicates_of` on a dummy obligation cause's body id) - #143520 (Fix perf regression caused by tracing) - #143532 (More carefully consider span context when suggesting remove `&mut`) - #143606 (configure.py: Write last key in each section) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 9, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of #143475 - tgross35:runtime-test-config, r=jieyouxu tests: Use `cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128` in `conv-bits-runtime-const` `conv-bits-runtime-const` gates `f16` and `f128` tests behind `x86_64`, but this isn't always accurate. In particular, x86 `MinGW` has an ABI bug [1] which means things work when linked to our Rust math libraries but don't work with host libraries. RUST-143405 slightly adjusts which targets we provide `f16` and `f128` symbols for and effectively removes MinGW from that list, meaning host libraries start getting linked, meaning `f16` and `f128` tests start to fail. Account for this by changing the gates in one such test to `cfg(target_has_reliable_{f16,f128})` which is the way we should be gating all behavior related to the types going forward. `rustfmt` also seems to have formatted the macros which is fine. [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115054
    
  github-actions bot
      pushed a commit
        to devnexen/miri
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 10, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#142357 (Simplify LLVM bitcode linker in bootstrap and add tests for it) - rust-lang/rust#143177 (Remove false label when `self` resolve failure does not relate to macro) - rust-lang/rust#143339 (Respect endianness correctly in CheckEnums test suite) - rust-lang/rust#143426 (clippy fix: indentation) - rust-lang/rust#143475 (tests: Use `cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128` in `conv-bits-runtime-const`) - rust-lang/rust#143499 (Don't call `predicates_of` on a dummy obligation cause's body id) - rust-lang/rust#143520 (Fix perf regression caused by tracing) - rust-lang/rust#143532 (More carefully consider span context when suggesting remove `&mut`) - rust-lang/rust#143606 (configure.py: Write last key in each section) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
conv-bits-runtime-constgatesf16andf128tests behindx86_64, but this isn't always accurate. In particular, x86MinGWhas an ABI bug 1 which means things work when linked to our Rust math libraries but don't work with host libraries. RUST-143405 slightly adjusts which targets we providef16andf128symbols for and effectively removes MinGW from that list, meaning host libraries start getting linked, meaningf16andf128tests start to fail.Account for this by changing the gates in one such test to
cfg(target_has_reliable_{f16,f128})which is the way we should be gating all behavior related to the types going forward.rustfmtalso seems to have formatted the macros which is fine.